|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Malice Redeemer
Redeemer Group
Joint Venture Conglomerate
29
   |
Posted - 2012.05.14 20:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tacyon wrote:
.....snip....
Don't take away what we already have.
.....snip...
You would think this is a lesson they would not need too repeat so soon
Make sure to send us an email in a few month when you get this working anywhere near right. We will be waiting. |
Malice Redeemer
Redeemer Group
Joint Venture Conglomerate
29
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 21:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Goliath wrote:Guys, honestly, the teams and I appreciate the feedback, and we do read it.
There is a recurrent theme in this thread of "change isn't improvement, its change", and to that I would just say look at the evolution of software as a whole - compare Windows 95 to Windows 8, IE to Chrome, etc - things can't be static forever and must evolve, sometimes in a dramatic way. Usability issues are excellent feedback. Simply saying "it's different, I don't want to adjust, give me the old one" is not particularly useful to the team. They have selected the design direction they are going in and it's not just a case of putting in a checkbox that says "use old system X" to cater to those who aren't keen on a slight adjustment to a system.
Please do keep the usability feedback coming though - for instance, the behaviour of using "loot all" and then having an extra cargo window - this is the kind of use issue that can be dealt with.
change for the sake of change eh? should more like people trying to impress bosses with bullet points then good design
I love how your using these examples willy nilly. Just so you know, windows has been heading downhill for years, mostly due to this very problem, change for the sake of change without checking with these users first. Chrome is great, maybe if you product was fixing issues with work flows like chrome did by bringing in new ideas, and not just cloning 15 year old software(windows explorer)
we need less excuses and more working solutions |
Malice Redeemer
Redeemer Group
Joint Venture Conglomerate
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.20 02:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
I guess they have no idea the **** storm they are going to kick up, neat. I think they believe that most people know whats happening from the dev blog and are ok, but did we have a real problem until they dropped incarna on live?
I was already out the door, as I had seen the changes on test, but a ton of people I know ingame never get on there or even the forums. The same kind of people that told me just to relax at it would be ok, only to leave after is was on live because my words just really could not convince them how bad it was going to be.
Its happening again,I swear they wont get on the test server because they are afraid of how bad it is, though they won't admit it
Here it comes. |
Malice Redeemer
Redeemer Group
Joint Venture Conglomerate
39
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 21:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Proton Power wrote:I have been playing for 9 years now, I have seen just about every change, some good some bad. As an industrilist this is one of the worst changes I have seen yet. I am not even sure I have the willpower to stick around and learn to deal with this one. You went from a very simple easy design to this garbage....
I have been telling them for a month, they do not care how bad they break the game. There excuse? We will fix it later, no biggie |
Malice Redeemer
Redeemer Group
Joint Venture Conglomerate
76
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 11:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Pierced Brosmen wrote:Due to the tree view, my in-station inventory window takes up 5 times more of the screen then it used to, bechause it used to be very discrete at the bottom of the screen, being short and wide... Now I can't have that window set-up, cause the only parts of the tree view I can see without scolling is active ship and drone bay....
its so bad in so many ways |
|
|
| |
|